Grass-Fed vs. Grass Finished

written by

Joel Salatin

posted on

December 11, 2023

One of our customers sent this explanation from another farmer:

“We do augment the diet as needed to meet the animal’s nutritional requirements with grain. Grass does not grow in sufficient quantity and quality to meet an animal’s nutritional needs. In the spring the protein is high while the calories are low and then toward the end of summer the calories exceed the animal's need while the protein is too low.”

Is Polyface depriving or abusing its herbivores by not feeding any grain?

These are great questions and certainly come from a confusing litany of production protocols. Let’s dig in.

Grass quality and quantity do fluctuate throughout the year and that is one reason why wild herds migrated long distances. With today’s land ownership and domestic stock, these lengthy cyclical migrations are difficult if not impossible. Some animals did not migrate: deer, elk, turkeys, grouse, and others. Those species can scrounge things seasonally and adjust their conception and birthing (or hatching, as the case may be) to match feed availability and type.

The craft of grass-finishing herbivores (cows, sheep, goats) is often compared to wine-making inasmuch as it is both art and science. While some places have wide quantity and quality forage-finishing ability, others have narrow times. For example, Mediterranean climates like California have a rainy and dry season of roughly six months each, creating a narrower period in which quality and quantity of forage are of finishing caliber.

Obviously, the upper reaches of Canada similarly deal with a narrow finishing window with a compressed growing season. Fortunately, the mid-Atlanta region lies in the correct latitude and climate for a long quality-quantity availability window. South Carolina is perhaps a bit better, but summer heat comes into play, deteriorating forage quality.

All this said, however, the art and science of 100 percent grass finishing can be done anywhere and is in fact being done everywhere.

As Allan Nation, editor of Stockman Grass Farmer Magazine often says: “If someone has done it, it can be done.” The default position too often is “I can’t” when in reality that’s an excuse for a host of issues, from management to fertility to genetics. Grass finishing requires a whole spectrum of correct procedures. Missing any of them can mess with the end product.

The challenge is to create the quality and quantity of forage necessary. In the mid-Atlantic region, that’s easy about 5 months out of the year. It’s not too hard to manage things for another 3 months. The final 4 months (primarily Dec., Jan., Feb., Mar.) become extremely difficult. Think of vegetables. It’s easy to grow tomatoes in the summer. With some season extension plastic tunnels or hoop houses you can extend it a month or two on either end. But if you want tomatoes in January, you need a sophisticated heated greenhouse with all the bells and whistles–maybe even a brush to pollinate the blooms.

At Polyface, we drastically reduce our beef processing in the winter, selecting only a handful of top animals and feeding them exceptionally excellent stored hay. We also use this time to slaughter cull cows (old, open, ornery–the 3 O’s) or poor doers, turning them into ground beef or hot dogs. This is an excellent use of non-prime animals. We plan our heaviest harvests for May through November when our grazing management and the season collaborate for abundant high-quality forage.

As to the starch and protein fluctuations, by moving the herd every day to a new paddock and strategically managing the growth cycle of the forage, we’re able to fudge the natural season quite a bit. For example, since we’ve built up our soil with compost for several decades, our grass even in June or July thinks it’s still May due to the dampness and biological activity in the soil. One pound of organic matter holds four pounds of water, so increasing this water-retentive capacity builds forgiveness in the soil. This stimulates biomass production later into the season, cools down the soil, and aids clover growth to augment the grass growth. Our almost religious adherence to moving the cows to a new paddock every day–what we call mob stocking herbivorous solar conversion lignified carbon sequestration fertilization–allows us to approximate the quality and quantity of forage on our farm that otherwise the migratory herbivores would need to migrate to find.

Matching the cows to the grass, the finishing animal to the proper paddock: this is not easy, but it’s certainly not impossible. The reason so many farmers use grains, beet pulp, or other additives in their programs is because their management is not yet sophisticated enough or they really don’t believe an herbivore can deliver a pleasant eating experience on forage alone. To be sure, the genetic component in the protocol is huge. Many farmers are die-hard breed defenders–black, spotted, hairy–rather than simply letting nature decide what color, size, and hair coat works best in a given environment. Genetic adaptability to a region and management protocol cannot be minimized.

At Polyface, we’re selecting our own bulls out of our own herd to develop a highly adapted pre-potency for our area. Over time, our animals will not look like the most grass-adapted phenotypes in Ontario or Florida. But they will exhibit nativized resiliency.

All of this takes time and faith. The herbivore genetics that current American farmers-turned-grass-lovers start with are woefully mis-matched. That creates a lot of variability in the end product and is one of the big challenges here at Polyface. Secondly, the level of management expertise required to grass finish is achievable only by the top tier of farmers. Most will not take the time or attention to detail to be successful. They will take a shortcut, like feeding grain or offering urea lick tanks as a supplement. These are not necessary but often touted as necessary by folks unwilling to go for the top trophy.

Thirdly, a willingness for both the producer and consumer to accept some seasonal variability in volume and quality will go a long way in meshing the market and climate. We can all be thankful that the freezer has enabled us to not have to follow the migrating herds. Instead, we can harvest large amounts when conditions are best and stockpile it for times when conditions are not as good. Extricating ourselves, with this good modern technology, means we don’t have to be concerned about starving in the winter, but can instead curl up with a good book or go watch a Nutcracker performance. Life is good.

Be assured that Polyface is committed to offering 100 percent grassfinished, no grain, herbivores. The best thing our patrons can do is buy in bulk in season, acquire a domestic freezer for better storage options, and appreciate seasonal variations in quantity and taste. Remember, it’s pretty unnatural to have fresh steaks in a meat counter any time you want them. Enjoying seasonality is one of the biggest first steps to embracing our ecological nest.

Embrace, caress, participate.

Joel Salatin

More from the blog

Food Shortages

I'm in Oregon today speaking at the Azure Harvest Festival and a question from the audience during a Q&A stimulated a lot of discussion:  "What do you think about the possibility and preparation surrounding food shortages?" David Stelzer, founder of Azure Standard, answered that the issue is not food volume, it's food nutrition.   That was an interesting answer that has a lot of merit.  As a nation, we are overfed and undernourished.  This is the crux of the MAHA movement and the epidemic diseases we see in our country. At Polyface, we know the pastured meat and poultry we produce is far superior in essential phytochemicals and other nutrients due to the carotenes, exercise, and stress-free habitat we offer.  You can taste the difference, feel the difference in texture, and measure it empirically. Perhaps my most poignant affirmation was our cat test.   We purchased meat from the supermarket and offered our own for the four cats.  They wouldn't touch the conventional meat (ground beef). Even though two plates and four cats would be much easier to accommodate if they spread out, all four crowded around the plate with our meat, eating it all and licking it up, before later sniffing and gingerly eating the supermarket counterpart. Since cats don't understand TV ads or USDA propaganda, they know what's good and what's not.   We encourage anyone dismissive of food differences to ask their pets:  you can trust them far more than doctors and experts. Yes, I get the nutrient deficiency angle on the shortage question.  But I'd like to explore it a bit further.   Right now, the world throws away more human-edible food, as a percentage of production, than at any time in human history.  The planet is awash in food.   Some 40 percent gets thrown away because it has a slight blemish, exceeds the sell-by date, or is tainted in some way.  We have a fundamentally segregated food supply rather than an integrated one, and that creates a lot of unusable waste. The vulnerabilities of our food system, I think, are much more subtle.  When I was in Uruguay two years ago, speaking at a conference, one of the other presenters was from Germany and showed a soil map of the globe.  Not a single commercial agricultural region had a stable or positive soil trajectory.  Every single area on the planet is losing soil; some faster than others, but globally our soil depletion continues without any sign of abatement. This is not a good trajectory.   As much as the technocrats promise food without soil, that's not the way to bet.  Soil is the skin of the earth.  When it goes, famine results.   The main difference now compared to centuries ago is that we have the capacity to move food around.   Nobody starves due to a lack of food on the planet; they starve due to socio-political unrest and dysfunction. But what happens when massive areas can't grow anything anymore?  Even being able to move food around doesn't help when there isn't enough.   The soil trajectory does not look good.  But at Polyface, we're building soil.  Areas covered with shale (layered rocks) half a century ago now have a foot of soil on them.  That's not the 3-5 feet that 150 years of inappropriate tillage eroded, but it's a build-back start. In addition to soil loss, as a planet we're seeing hydrologic decreases.   The Oglala aquifer, which undergirds the irrigated agriculture in five states, has dropped more than 100 feet in the last half-century.  At its current rate, it will be unpumpable in about 50 more years.  Imagine if all those circular irrigation pivots in Nebraska and Kansas shut down.  What then? At Polyface, we keep building ponds to inventory surface runoff.  By definition, surface runoff occurs when rains come too fast at once or too much at one time for the soil to absorb it.  Holding that and using it strategically in a drought is a way to reduce flooding during rain events and grow grass when it gets dry.  This is one of the most landscape resilient techniques we can implement. Finally, major animal and plant diseases threaten the world's food systems like never before.   African swine fever, hoof and mouth disease in cattle, and bird flu in poultry appear to be getting worse and covering larger areas.  Why?  We believe it's because chemicals and factory farming compromise the immunological systems in both plants and animals.  Monocrops and chemical fertilizers wreak havoc on immune systems, opening the planet's food systems to new levels of fragility. In contrast, at Polyface, we believe happy animals and biodiversity offer the best antidote to immunological deficiency.  Stress from unsanitary conditions, mono-species density, or dietary deficiency (rations or fertilizer) invites disease.  Nature uses disease to cull the weak.  Predators pick off the stragglers.  This is the way biology works. But at Polyface, we keep these vulnerabilities at bay with compost fertilization, pasture rotations, and lots of species diversity, including pollinators and wildlife. Here's the point:  the basic long-term vulnerabilities in the planet's food systems could all be reversed with practices Polyface uses every day.  Looked at another way, the entire food shortage question could be answered if eaters and farmers implemented these ecological and immunological protocols, working together to rather than completely separated.  We don't need to fall into an abyss of starvation. If we all simply began eating food from farms that build soil, increase water, and stimulate immunity, we could deliver a hospitable, abundant planet to our children.   Reversing these trajectories wouldn't take much time or money.  It takes intentionally-minded folks who connect the chain of sustenance from their plate to the planet. Polyface patrons do that.  Thank you.  Let's heal the land together. Joel