Grazing Plan

written by

Joel Salatin

posted on

March 4, 2025

With the change in weather this week, we feel spring in the air.  

What a welcome change and relief from the unusually cold winter we've enjoyed.  

The cows are still eating hay; the fields are still winter-frozen brown; the chickens and pigs are still in hoophouses. But you can feel the change in the air. 

And going outside without a coat is always welcome.

With grass green-up a mere few days away, I've been doing one of my late winter chores: creating a 2025-26 grazing plan.  

With nearly 1,000 head of cattle and a dozen properties, putting the right number at the right place for the right period of time and moving them all every day is quite a logistical puzzle.

How do we know how many to put on a place, when to stock and when to destock on the various properties, and how to schedule all these moving parts?  

Like any huge project, it's like eating an elephant: one bite at a time.

The first thing is to write down the various properties and their available pasture acreages:

HT:  70   

GG:  125                  

BM:  240                  

SU:  40                 

and on and on.

Each of these properties has a different fertility level, which means the acreages vary, sometimes significantly, in the amount of grass they can grow. Just like some parts of your lawn grow thicker grass than others, some acreages grow more forage than others.  

Because we know the history of each one, we know which ones are more productive and which ones less so.

The key to everything is a standard measure. 

Allocation of animals is based on a way to measure forage production. That standard is the cow-day.  Carpenters use inches.  Electricians use volts, watts, and amps.  Bankers use dollars.  

The point is every vocation needs some kind of measurement standard. For us, it's a cow-day: the amount of grass one cow equivalent will eat in one day.  Obviously a baby calf is not a "cow equivalent".  A just-weaned calf (called a stocker) is about half of one "cow equivalent".

The whole herd is divided into roughly four groups:  mama cows (and their calves once they start calving at the end of March), stockers (year-old calves), finishers (two-year-old calves approaching processing), and the hodge-podge (a mixture of final finishers, called fats, bred heifers, and perhaps some struggling calves that need some extra care). This last group is always kept at Polyface central--the farm hub.

Each herd is then assigned a cow equivalent number.  For example, 300 stockers would be 150 cow equivalents while 300 finishers would be 230 cow equivalents.  

Now we have a standard measure of the group that we can match with the cow-day production of the various pastures.  

Lots of nuances enter into the plan.  

For example, grass doesn't grow consistently throughout the season.  It starts slow, then speeds up, then might slow down if it gets hot and dry, then speeds up again if we get rain in the fall before things get too cold.

By keeping records from year to year, we have a historical production record, or average, that we can use to guide us in this year's plan.  

For example, if property HT yielded 150 cow-days a year on average, we can be pretty sure that by the first of May it'll offer 50 cow-days, then by August first another 50, then another 50 at the end of the season or even into the winter. That's like three mowings in the season.

So if we have a 150-cow-equivalent herd and HT has 50 cow-days on 70 acres, that's a total of 3,500 cow-days divided by 150 is roughly 23 days we can feed that herd at that location at that time of year.  

Yes, it's a lot--a lot--of math.  

But the formula is the same across all properties; the mastery is in knowing a ballpark cow-day forage volume at a certain time of year and plugging the right herd into that spot.

Lest anyone think this is normal planning for cattle, it's not.  

Probably in the U.S., not 2 in 100 cattle farmers do this, think about it, or know how to do it.  They just have their herd in a pasture for the year very little real planning or management.  

At Polyface, this level of management is the key to mimicking the migrational choreography of the wild herds that traversed North America 500 years ago and bequeathed to us the rich alpha soils modern chemical and grain-based agriculture is still mining.

We don't have the wolves and fires of yesteryear to move the herds around; what we have is electric fence and water lines:  those are the steering wheel, brake, and accelerator on the 4-legged forage pruners.  

By moving them around, we can let the grass rest and regrow between prunings, enabling it to get stronger, healthier, and thicker.  

This marries today's high tech control and water infrastructure with ancient wild patterns.

The reason Polyface beef tastes and handles beautifully is because this management stimulates lush forages and lots of plant diversity: hence our term, SALAD BAR BEEF.  

It's as close to antiquity's ecology and nutrition as you can get with today's domestic livestock.

What's on your plate starts in late winter, with vestiges of the last snow melting in the road ditches, with a calculator, lots of paper, figuring, and head scratching to get all the animals at the right place at the right time throughout the year.  

While I'm poring over these formulas and figures, I'm thinking about the cook-outs and family dinner tables that will enjoy this labor of love.  

Thank you for partnering with us in this great land healing and nutrition-satisfying endeavor.  You know you're always welcome to visit our--your--cows.

Joel

More from the blog

Food Shortages

I'm in Oregon today speaking at the Azure Harvest Festival and a question from the audience during a Q&A stimulated a lot of discussion:  "What do you think about the possibility and preparation surrounding food shortages?" David Stelzer, founder of Azure Standard, answered that the issue is not food volume, it's food nutrition.   That was an interesting answer that has a lot of merit.  As a nation, we are overfed and undernourished.  This is the crux of the MAHA movement and the epidemic diseases we see in our country. At Polyface, we know the pastured meat and poultry we produce is far superior in essential phytochemicals and other nutrients due to the carotenes, exercise, and stress-free habitat we offer.  You can taste the difference, feel the difference in texture, and measure it empirically. Perhaps my most poignant affirmation was our cat test.   We purchased meat from the supermarket and offered our own for the four cats.  They wouldn't touch the conventional meat (ground beef). Even though two plates and four cats would be much easier to accommodate if they spread out, all four crowded around the plate with our meat, eating it all and licking it up, before later sniffing and gingerly eating the supermarket counterpart. Since cats don't understand TV ads or USDA propaganda, they know what's good and what's not.   We encourage anyone dismissive of food differences to ask their pets:  you can trust them far more than doctors and experts. Yes, I get the nutrient deficiency angle on the shortage question.  But I'd like to explore it a bit further.   Right now, the world throws away more human-edible food, as a percentage of production, than at any time in human history.  The planet is awash in food.   Some 40 percent gets thrown away because it has a slight blemish, exceeds the sell-by date, or is tainted in some way.  We have a fundamentally segregated food supply rather than an integrated one, and that creates a lot of unusable waste. The vulnerabilities of our food system, I think, are much more subtle.  When I was in Uruguay two years ago, speaking at a conference, one of the other presenters was from Germany and showed a soil map of the globe.  Not a single commercial agricultural region had a stable or positive soil trajectory.  Every single area on the planet is losing soil; some faster than others, but globally our soil depletion continues without any sign of abatement. This is not a good trajectory.   As much as the technocrats promise food without soil, that's not the way to bet.  Soil is the skin of the earth.  When it goes, famine results.   The main difference now compared to centuries ago is that we have the capacity to move food around.   Nobody starves due to a lack of food on the planet; they starve due to socio-political unrest and dysfunction. But what happens when massive areas can't grow anything anymore?  Even being able to move food around doesn't help when there isn't enough.   The soil trajectory does not look good.  But at Polyface, we're building soil.  Areas covered with shale (layered rocks) half a century ago now have a foot of soil on them.  That's not the 3-5 feet that 150 years of inappropriate tillage eroded, but it's a build-back start. In addition to soil loss, as a planet we're seeing hydrologic decreases.   The Oglala aquifer, which undergirds the irrigated agriculture in five states, has dropped more than 100 feet in the last half-century.  At its current rate, it will be unpumpable in about 50 more years.  Imagine if all those circular irrigation pivots in Nebraska and Kansas shut down.  What then? At Polyface, we keep building ponds to inventory surface runoff.  By definition, surface runoff occurs when rains come too fast at once or too much at one time for the soil to absorb it.  Holding that and using it strategically in a drought is a way to reduce flooding during rain events and grow grass when it gets dry.  This is one of the most landscape resilient techniques we can implement. Finally, major animal and plant diseases threaten the world's food systems like never before.   African swine fever, hoof and mouth disease in cattle, and bird flu in poultry appear to be getting worse and covering larger areas.  Why?  We believe it's because chemicals and factory farming compromise the immunological systems in both plants and animals.  Monocrops and chemical fertilizers wreak havoc on immune systems, opening the planet's food systems to new levels of fragility. In contrast, at Polyface, we believe happy animals and biodiversity offer the best antidote to immunological deficiency.  Stress from unsanitary conditions, mono-species density, or dietary deficiency (rations or fertilizer) invites disease.  Nature uses disease to cull the weak.  Predators pick off the stragglers.  This is the way biology works. But at Polyface, we keep these vulnerabilities at bay with compost fertilization, pasture rotations, and lots of species diversity, including pollinators and wildlife. Here's the point:  the basic long-term vulnerabilities in the planet's food systems could all be reversed with practices Polyface uses every day.  Looked at another way, the entire food shortage question could be answered if eaters and farmers implemented these ecological and immunological protocols, working together to rather than completely separated.  We don't need to fall into an abyss of starvation. If we all simply began eating food from farms that build soil, increase water, and stimulate immunity, we could deliver a hospitable, abundant planet to our children.   Reversing these trajectories wouldn't take much time or money.  It takes intentionally-minded folks who connect the chain of sustenance from their plate to the planet. Polyface patrons do that.  Thank you.  Let's heal the land together. Joel